On 6 September 2013 04:15, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Anyone have information on how useful it is to study 'Production' of a > native word to a foreign word? I feel I might be doubling my work load and > getting nowhere near equal return. > > Thanks, > Lesaun Harvey >
Hi, that's a good question. It's well documented that "active" recall is far more powerful for learning than passively reviewing information - but all study in Mnemosyne or any SRS is a type of active recall. So, is production mode more effective than recognition for learning? Here's one study: "Effects of Recognition Task and Production Task on Incidental Vocabulary Learning of Iranian EFL Learners" URL: http://www.irjabs.com/files_site/paperlist/r_683_130304200448.pdf Result: Both had a significant effect, but production had a significantly higher effect (mean score of production group in vocabulary post-test was 48.50, while recognition group was 34.30, with p<0.05). So that's a yes, in one study anyway. I don't have time to dig deeper in their references or Google Scholar to find other work on the topic, but maybe others here have further insights. The question of whether that benefit is worth _double_ your time, if that is the case, is also an interesting one. For a start, it would be useful to know exactly how much workload is involved in both modes of study. Oisín -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mnemosyne-proj-users/CAO-0pXDk%2BG_KsicCWhGDB36gKuod4v6Lmn_owD-53RBxPPYM-A%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
