>yes, superfluous tags should not be nessesary. By the way, it has been quite >helpful to rename tags to "MainTag::SubTag1, MainTag, >MainTag2::SubTag2", it >would not hurt to reactivate this functionality.
Not sure I understand this, as ‘MainTag’ is clearly a superfluous tag here. Or are you taking about autocomplete for tags if you have more than 1 tag? That should be working still. Some other remarks on your workflow: · If you feel ‘bad cards’ hold you back, either edit them so that they become easier to memorise, or simply deactivate them. · You seem to be using tags for two different purposes, which apparently are sometimes in conflict: semantically organise your cards for your language buddy, and studying only a subset of your cards. You might consider using two different groups of tags for this: one group to organise your cards into a nice tree for your language partner, and a second set of personal tags to focus your own personal study. The first group of tags would be always inactive, and if you group your personal tags in a separate tree (abacus::tag 1, …) it will be easy for your buddy to find and delete them. A suspect that with a combination of these two approaches, it should be possible to fit your workflow into Mnemosyne without the need for a convoluted feature like automatic saved set activation. Cheers, Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mnemosyne-proj-users/10f6a7196ed0487b843c6a566649cb65%40xmail102.UGent.be. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
