Comment #3 on issue 2067 by tom.uijldert: SLEE not compliant with JSLEE
1.1, par. 8.6.6 (concurrency control)
http://code.google.com/p/mobicents/issues/detail?id=2067
Ok, let me see if I can get my head around this:
In this case, an event in a parentSbb selects and executes an object for
that
Sbb entity.
The subsequent call of a childSbb SbbLocalObject-method does not select a
childSbb object but just executes this synchronously within the parentSbb
object.
The subsequently triggered event on the childSbb selects a childSbb object
that can execute the event-handling code in parallel since the concurrency
control semantics do not apply here.
Hence, any SbbLocalObject-method code has access to an Sbb entities' state
but
cannot change it.
So the solution here is to refactor the "disconnect()"-method into
a "disconnect" event that is fired on the childSbb.
Is this correct and is that what I was overlooking?
If so, the difference is fairly subtle and I may not be the only one to
implicitly
assume that an SbbLocalObject method-invocation would select an Sbb-object
for that
(childSbb-) entity.
Thanks in advance for any clarification.
Regards,
Tom.
