On Apr 15, 2014, at 4:18 PM, Todd Orler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now that I'm back, I need to update our product with an update of CBL. I see > there is still a "stable" branch, and there are also tags for various > checkpoints, such as "1.0-beta3". I'd like some guidance on which to choose. > We're looking for a very stable branch for now. I would download the beta 3.1 release. If you want to build it yourself, you can just check out the tag, which is ... um, we forgot to tag it. Let me fix that. The tag is 1.0-beta3.1; here's the fancy Github release page for it. > I'd normally choose the "stable" branch, but I see that "master" is being > merged into the "stable" branch fairly regularly (twice in the last 4 days). Ordinarily the stable branch should be good to use, but we had an issue yesterday where someone checked in some build-breaking changes that had to be reverted. :/ The branch should be fine now. It's newer than beta 3.1, basically a candidate for the 1.0 release. As Traun says, we're going to start using a new branching strategy. But 'master' will continue to be the bleeding-edge stuff, and 'stable' will continue to lag a bit behind but be more reliable. --Jens -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Couchbase Mobile" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mobile-couchbase/11E5766D-B0D4-4096-8CC7-C675D36EA26D%40couchbase.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
