Thanks for the clarification. Should we skip searching with attachment cause it seems like a hassle, and maybe wait for a feature that covers this from you guys?
Regards CouchbaseLover Den lördagen den 7:e juni 2014 kl. 00:22:19 UTC+2 skrev Jens Alfke: > > > On Jun 4, 2014, at 12:14 AM, CouchbaseLover <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > 1. The attachment linked to a document is in another document within the > database. (100%) > 2. The shadowing bucket does not receive the attachment documents but only > the documents that has a link to the attachment documents. (50%) > > > Right. > > 3. You simply can't search and get attachments cause the attachment > filesystem is not reachable within the Couchbase SDK even though we search > in the non shadowing bucket(the bucket Couchbase Lite talks to) (10 %) > > > I don’t know what you mean by “attachment filesystem”. The gateway doesn’t > store attachments in the filesystem; they’re just extra docs in the bucket. > The document ID starts with “_sync:att:” and is followed by the SHA-1 > digest of the attachment data. (Ordinarily you shouldn’t mess with the docs > in the gateway’s private bucket, but I agree that this is one case where > you have to, in order to access the attachments directly from Couchbase.) > > —Jens > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Couchbase Mobile" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mobile-couchbase/c9c434f4-3470-419c-86d3-91e417fb333f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
