On Jul 10, 2014, at 7:25 PM, hoang nguyen <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have sqlite db, i converted to cblite and check the smooth of apps. > I found that apps using sqlite seems have better performance and run more > smooth than apps using cblite. You're comparing apples and oranges. SQLite is a lot lower level than Couchbase Lite; in particular, it doesn't do synchronization or provide a object-oriented API. Also, since Couchbase Lite currently uses SQLite to store its data, it can't possibly be faster than raw SQLite. :) If all you need to do is store data locally in a fixed schema and are willing to use a very low-level C API to do it (or a slightly higher-level OOP wrapper), then SQLite is a better bet. --Jens -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Couchbase Mobile" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mobile-couchbase/E620585B-726B-49C4-BF57-E48D242405DD%40couchbase.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
