On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 11:00:23AM +0100, Gervase Markham wrote: > On 01/10/13 01:40, Mike Hommey wrote: > > While their license (Apache License 2.0) allow binary redistribution > > without the corresponding source (although there is a source jar for > > commons-net), shouldn't Mozilla redistribute the sources as well? > > I don't think we have an explicit written policy about this. My > inclination would be to say that we should have the source code of > software we are building in repos under our control, but I'm fairly sure > that's not actually true for large chunks of B2G, which are pulled in > from 3rd party repos at build time...
Apart from closed-source binary blobs, I actually think we're building everything from source in b2g. The question was about java binaries in mozilla-central, though. Mike _______________________________________________ mobile-firefox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
