Yes, this sounds like a separate bug, and I agree with Paolo that it sounds like something is wrong with that profile. It would be great if you could file a new bug, and we can investigate there.
Thanks, Margaret On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Paolo Amadini <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/28/2014 8:22 PM, Aaron Train wrote: > > I believe this is bug > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1114637 > > This bug also occurs, but it should not make the download fail, and the > first message ("Unknown notification id") seems more relevant. Maybe > this is a different bug, or a new one should be filed blocking 901360? > It may be something specific to this profile, since Nightly works. > > Paolo > > >> On Dec 26, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Axel Nennker <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> just did a "hg pull -u" and rebuild Fennec. > >> > >> Now I get "The download cannot be saved because an unknown error > >> occurred" on every download. > >> Nightly works though. > >> > >> cheers > >> Axel > >> > >> W/GeckoConsole(20499): [JavaScript Error: "Unknown notification id" > >> {file: "resource://gre/modules/DownloadList.jsm" line: 216}] > >> W/GeckoConsole(20499): [JavaScript Error: "Unix error 1 during > >> operation setPermissions on file > >> /storage/emulated/0/Download/AmazonApps-release(2).apk (Operation not > >> permitted)" {file: "resource://gre/modules/DownloadIntegration.jsm" > >> line: 511}] > >> W/ContextImpl(27643): Failed to ensure directory: > >> > /storage/extSdCard/Android/data/org.mozilla.fennec_ignisvulpis/files/Download > >> W/ActivityManager( 858): Unable to start service Intent { > >> cmp=com.android.email/.service.AttachmentDownloadService } U=0: not > found > >> > >> > >> 2014-12-16 17:23 GMT+01:00 Margaret Leibovic > >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: > >> > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> Just an FYI here that I landed the patches in bug 901360 > >> yesterday, so please be on the lookout for any downloads-related > >> regressions. Last time we tried to land patches for this bug > >> (geez, that was all the way back in April), we had to back them > >> out for causing too many regressions, but the new set of patches > >> should address those known issues. > >> > >> If you find any problems, please file a bug and make it block bug > >> 901360. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Margaret >
_______________________________________________ mobile-firefox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
