On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Mike Hoye <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2015-01-27 1:43 PM, Nicholas Alexander wrote: > >> >> Can we get somebody with more Bugzilla-fu to address this? If we drop >> the "list_id", can we share this? Can we name these queries? I'm CCing >> mhoye and lizzard, who I think both are master bug wranglers and might be >> able to help. >> > > I think you're overcomplicating things with second/third bugs, tbh. We've > got good-first, good-next, diamond and experience-required as categories, > as described here: > I kind of agree. We could just label good-next and be done. I think good-second, good-third begins to get a bit too subjective on the part of the labeler. > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Contribute/Coding/Mentoring > > ... but rather than expect users to search on and find good-Nth bugs, > you'll have far more success (and way better retention!) by pointing newish > contributors to a next bug after they've completed a first one rather than > hoping that they'll pick one up themselves. > I see this already happening in some bugs. > > "Thank you! While that patch is getting merged, would you like to take a > look at this other bug? It looks like a good fit for your skills." > > Expressing gratitude and saying you'd like to keep working with someone > will do way more for your community than any regex. Do the search for them > at first, you'll see people start to pick up their own bugs soon enough. > > I think the list of bugs is such that even we need some quick searches to find the next bug.
_______________________________________________ mobile-firefox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
