On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Nathan Toone <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It's a wart at the moment, not well tracked in Bugzilla, that GeckoView > rolls the entirety of Fennec into the GeckoView AAR. Extracting pieces > /out/ of that situation is very difficult; I have written to this list > about how hard this is in the past. It's not getting easier. > > I’d like to propose keeping the entirety of Fennec in the GeckoView AAR > (especially if it’s not easy to separate). That addresses my “Full > Application AAR” question I had :) > I can't speak for the group, but this is an anti-goal for GeckoView. The major knock on GeckoView is that it's large. We have approach that should reduce the current 40M or so to 25-30M or so; those approaches will include not shipping Fennec. If you want a full Fennec AAR, I'm happy to help produce it, modulo time and feasibility constraints, but GeckoView is not the vehicle. For the foreseeable future, however, you're safe -- the work to remove Fennec code from GV is significant and un-resourced. Best, Nick
_______________________________________________ mobile-firefox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
