+1 please resolve them in a massive WONTFIX On Dec 13, 2012 7:32 AM, "Quim Gil" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/13/2012 06:34 AM, Andre Klapper wrote:> Thanks for the answers (and > some followup triaging), however as I've > > mostly seen "enhancements vs bug reports" discussions my original > > question still remains: > > > >> Do you prefer if I mass-reopen them and set priority to "Lowest", or > >> would you like to skim them in the next days to set > >> WONTFIX/FIXED/whatever? > > If outsiders' opinions count, here goes a +1 for mass-WONTFIX and if > someone feels a certain resolution in a certain report is wrong (and cares > enough) they will reopen. > > PS: I personally like to handle enhancement requests in bugzilla too, > since the line between bug and feature is many time blurry. However, I > disagree with the idea that in an open source any enhancement request is > good and therefore must remain open. If the current development team seems > that a request is pointless / utopia / a deviation from the current plans > etc then it is ok to mark as WONTFIX. If someone feels like fighting then > they can reopen, assign to themselves, show how wrong the maintainers were, > fork, etc. Keeping unanswered open requests for years helps nobody. > > -- > Quim Gil > Technical Contributor Coordinator > Wikimedia Foundation > > ______________________________**_________________ > Mobile-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/mobile-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l> >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
