[that said a 'collapse all' certainly helps my concerns, since I can just click that]
James Alexander Legal and Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:48 PM, James Alexander <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Steven Walling > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> I'm not sure I agree with Steven's assessment that this will make >>> navigating between sections difficult - behaviour gets reverted - you close >>> the section to see the next section. This is akin to flicking through a >>> book and flicking to the next page (closing the section) if the heading at >>> the top of the page doesn't interest you. It just means you don't see all >>> the headings in one go which could be a good or bad thing. >>> >> > > Right... but if you don't actually see the other sections you have to > start closing them all to find out what is actually available. I know, at > least in my case, that will likely mean I just navigate away (or switch to > desktop view). In general I've found that what you 'see' at the start is > very important. Honestly I'm surprised it's even a question.. I can see > arguments for it being uncollapsed by default (find on page etc, even if I > don't agree with them) but there is little doubt in my mind that it hurts > the easy navigation. This is especially true without a table of contents > (which the compressed sections basically acted as), in a book you don't > just flick to the next page, you look at the TOC and know where to go. > >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
