> > 2) All it would provide is "template.add( key, htmlString )" and > "template.get( key )" returning said htmlString, it wouldn't invoke the > template engine because that's not yet shared. Also at this time, > MobileFrontend's version defines this add/get interface as "mw.template" > which seems too generic (should probably be mw.mobileFrontend.template or > mw.mfTemplate).
Agreed on this point. I know that Gabriel and I's solution is not quite ready and no one is using it yet; but we're going to need a custom RL module anyways at some point down the line. Our templates get compiled into an intermediate form which RL will deliver -- so it'll eventually have a LESS style pipeline. In any case, my solution's templates will not be compatible with your templates. So; perhaps mw.mustacheTemplate.get or something?
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
