Sounds good. I'm already handling the two-API-requests problem (they
request different sections, so it's trivial to uniformly exclude one kind).


On 28 April 2014 13:36, Toby Negrin <[email protected]> wrote:

> + Maryana/Oliver
>
> We're pulling some data for the Metrics meeting this Thursday that you
> should be aware of. It's one of the first steps in unraveling how to define
> a pageview (or other engagement/reach metrics)
>
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Mobile_Metrics#Datasets_and_deliverables
>
> Specifically
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Mobile_Traffic/Implementation
>
> -Toby
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yuvi, Monte, Toby, ideas?
>>
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Tomasz Finc <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Adam, lets move this to a public list and engage Yuvi, Monte, and Toby
>>> to answer your questions.
>>>
>>> --tomasz
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > The article loads for iOS and Android apps will no[w] both be in the
>>> web logs.
>>> > But I can't tell if the pageview counting code is still accurate; also,
>>> > there are two action=mobileview hits per page load in the apps, so it
>>> seems
>>> > like it may be inaccurate from my read of it.
>>> >
>>> > How can Analytics be engaged to straighten out the relevant section of
>>> code?
>>> > I think the app release dates may have been pushed out a bit more, so
>>> it may
>>> > not be an emergency, but I wanted to check on next steps.
>>> >
>>> > Here's the relevant code from my understanding:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/wikimedia/kraken/blob/master/kraken-generic/src/main/java/org/wikimedia/analytics/kraken/pageview/PageviewFilter.java#L113
>>> >
>>> > I don't think action=view and action=query qualify as pageviews
>>> anymore (at
>>> > least without even further qualification), if they ever were. It's
>>> possible
>>> > the pageview counting code in the link above is only an intermediate
>>> step in
>>> > the qualification of hits, but until we dig into it, it's an unknown.
>>> >
>>> > I wonder if asking Analytics for action=view and action=query to be
>>> removed,
>>> > and then to disqualify 1 of the 2 URL types for the apps would make
>>> sense.
>>> > Or rather, asking them if it sounds okay and if we should then run it
>>> by the
>>> > engineering mailing list for further refinement.
>>> >
>>> > -Adam
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l

Reply via email to