One problem I see with this is "OMG WIKIPEDIA REPORTS WHAT I'M USINGONEONEONE" even though e.g. Twitter does essentially the same.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Dan Garry <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Howie and I were chatting today about the users we're expecting on Apps. > We suspect that the nature of the app will attract a different user base > from Web and perhaps also Desktop, and that may mean we need to tailor the > features that go into the app to that user base. We'd like some data to > test that hypothesis > > Right now the tagging system just tags all edits are made on mobile, and > there's no way to distinguish between apps and web. We'd like to change > that. > > Splitting the tags would allow us to identify users that edit just on apps > and figure out if they are actually different. All in all, there's > potential for creating some really awesome data to analyse. > > My preferred solution is for us to have three tags for Mobile: Mobile Web, > iOS App, and Android app. That way, we can generate usage statistics really > easily for both iOS and Android independently of each other, and also > compare those to each other. > > There is also the possibility of tagging all edits as mobile using the > current tag, then additionally tagging edits as iOS and Android > respectively. That makes the numbers between Web and Apps harder to > compare, so I prefer the first option. > > Thoughts, guys? > > Thanks, > Dan > > -- > Dan Garry > Associate Product Manager for Platform and Mobile Apps > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Mobile-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l > > -- Best regards, Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
