I think the root issue in that we are committing CSS on all children. We've
yet to come up with a more efficient way of computing the outline of an
element but we're open to ideas. Potentially we could drop the shields and
only compute outlines on focus. I believe we only need the shields for IE
which doesn't respect contenteditable=false.
On 15 May 2014 23:58, "Jon Robson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm still waiting for Kaldari or someone in mobile to merge
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/131892 before I can confirm the current
> state.
>
> It definitely seems to be marginally improved on desktop and mobile
> (with desktop benefiting most) after a few runs.
>
> For the record the nasty page I'm testing on is
>
> http://en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Jon%27s_nasty_VE_test_page?mobileaction=alpha
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Roan Kattouw <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On May 15, 2014 10:27 AM, "Roan Kattouw" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Ed has been fixing some things to do with shields and phantoms. I'll
> send
> >> you some Gerrit links in a minute.
> >>
> > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/133236/
> >
> > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/130823/
> >
> > The former should address the importNode problem Jon mentioned and the
> > latter should improve CSS performance, as it addresses something similar
> to
> > a problem in MF that Jon reported.
> >
> > As James said, new performance feedback after these changes (though in
> > fairness one of them was merged only this week) would be helpful. We
> think
> > we've quashed most of the things Jon flagged initially, but we may not
> have
> > done so adequately or new problems may now be surfacing.
> >
> > Roan
>
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l

Reply via email to