It's a little more complicated then this so I wanted to quickly expand so this conversation has a few facts which have been missed.
There are two elements to this code. 1) Link hijacking and history API (generally stable) 2) Loading a page through API and rendering it. (has bugs) We use 2) after making an edit to avoid a page reload. This is good. This has been in stable but a lot of the bugs it has go unnoticed and usually get reported in alpha. So your assessment that it is not stable enough for beta is not quite accurate. I don't think I personally waste time on bugs here (most get back logged) but alpha helps us identify a lot of issues in the editing interface that may go unnoticed. Also if we ever want to serve a Firefox OS app via the mobile site we will need to keep iterating on this code. I don't think we waste significant resources on this code but others feel free to disagree. On 23 May 2014 18:36, "Max Semenik" <[email protected]> wrote: > No, seriously. It had been in alpha since forever, we routinely spend our > precious time on fixing bugs in it but it never was usable enough even > for promotion to beta. Let's not waste resources on it and kill it. > > -- > Best regards, > Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]]) > > _______________________________________________ > Mobile-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l > >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
