That looks like a good place to me and I like that it's not a mobile-specific page. We used to have a separate page documenting mobile browser support way back in the day, but I think it's since been deleted. It might be worthwhile to link to wherever this gets published from the Extension:MobileFrontend page.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Juliusz Gonera <[email protected]> wrote: > Where should I post this? Should I just edit > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Browser_support#Mobile_browsers directly? > > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Arthur Richards <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Juliusz, did this get posted to a wiki yet? >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Juliusz Gonera <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Interesting. And sad. Thanks for tracking that down. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 04/24/2014 04:34 AM, Derk-Jan Hartman wrote: >>> >>>> From: https://github.com/bestiejs/platform.js/issues/29 >>>> "the new S4 stock browser is actually using a bastardized version of >>>> Chrome Mobile, but locked at version 18.0.1025.308". >>>> >>>> they quote the ua as: "Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; en-au; >>>> SAMSUNG GT-I9500 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) >>>> Version/1.0 Chrome/18.0.1025.308 Mobie Safari/535.19" >>>> >>>> This UA might easily be mistaken for the vanilla version of Chrome.. >>>> There might be more browsers like that. Thank you manufacterers. >>>> >>>> DJ >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Juliusz Gonera <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Brion Vibber wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Just a quick note: Android 2.3 and Windows Phone 7.5 (IE 9) devices >>>>>> have >>>>>> no software upgrade path; we can only wait for them to fall out of the >>>>>> market as devices get replaced. [Well technically Android 2.3 users >>>>>> could >>>>>> run Firefox, but getting people to switch browsers on mobile is hard! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I know, but I'm not too worried about IE9. Its usage is already pretty >>>>> low. >>>>> When it comes to Android 2.3 a few months ago I had an idea of showing >>>>> banners to its users suggesting that they upgrade to Firefox. I'll >>>>> push more >>>>> for it so that we find some time to actually get it done. It should >>>>> not be >>>>> too difficult and I'd be curious to see if it improves Firefox metrics. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm also a little worried to see old versions of Chrome in there; does >>>>>> this mean there's a lot of people who aren't turning on updates on >>>>>> their >>>>>> phone and are using an old version that shipped with the phone? Or is >>>>>> there >>>>>> something else holding back updates on some devices? With Chrome and >>>>>> Firefox >>>>>> on fast release cycles, it can be a pain to support old bugs... >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm also not sure where this comes from. I'd wait and see if it >>>>> changes in >>>>> the next few months. If it doesn't, we could investigate why Chrome >>>>> Mobile >>>>> 18 and not any other old version is that popular. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Juliusz >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mobile-l mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mobile-l mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Arthur Richards >> Software Engineer, Mobile >> [[User:Awjrichards]] >> IRC: awjr >> +1-415-839-6885 x6687 >> > > -- Arthur Richards Team Practices Lead [[User:Awjrichards]] IRC: awjr +1-415-839-6885 x6687
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
