I personally would prefer 2, because buncing everything into one role would
be too inflexible. I don't see much maintenance overhead if compared with 1.


On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Juliusz Gonera <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I talked to Dan Duvall today and he said that many mobile browser
> tests fail on default vagrant instance because other extensions that
> are not hard dependencies of MF are not activated by default when
> activating the mobilefrontend role (extensions such as Echo, GeoData,
> VisualEditor). There are two things we can do:
>
> 1. Make other extensions that mobile uses dependencies of
> mobilefrontend role in vagrant
> 2. Create a separate role, e.g. mobilefrontend-browsertests, that will
> list mobilefrontend and all those extensions as its dependencies
>
> I was wondering if there is anyone who uses vagrant and would like to
> have MF enabled, but not all the other extensions. If not, 1. seems
> like a simpler solution.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Juliusz
>
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l

Reply via email to