We should definitely make it as small as possible. Our goal here is just to fix the bugs, nothing more. That way we're less likely to introduce additional bugs. We can get the features out later. :-)
Dan On 1 August 2014 11:34, Brion Vibber <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep, if we do a more conservative release I'll want to back port at least > the back-button fixes and that crash workaround. :) I'm investigating saved > pages now... > > -- brion > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Tomasz Finc <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Brion Vibber <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Dan, Tomasz is recommending that for our next push we do a small bug fix >> > iteration from the first release branch, rather than landing all the >> stuff >> > we've worked on in the last couple weeks right away. >> >> We're discussing this on IRC right now if you would like to join Dan. >> No decision has been made. I want to make sure we have confidence in >> what we push out and that we don't introduce new issues. >> >> > Do we want to push both "small" and "large" updates to TestFlight or >> should >> > we just send the "small" version? >> >> --tomasz >> > > -- Dan Garry Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
