On the one hand, if we WONTFIX all the bugs and remove the component, we've
got a clean break. It makes it clear that we are not officially supporting
the app now.

On the other hand, if we leave the bugs open, it would make it easier for a
community maintainer to pick up where we left off and take over
maintenance. But, it would suck to have people still reporting issues with
the expectation that they'll be fixed, when there's no chance we'll look at
them.

I think we should WONTFIX the bugs and prevent the filing of new bugs
against the Commons app somehow, so that people can't file new ones with
the expectation of fixes. But all the WONTFIXed bugs should remain in
Bugzilla so a community maintainer can access them if he desires.

Unless there are any objections or better ideas, I'll ask Andre to
implement something to this effect on Monday.

Dan

On 17 September 2014 00:59, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 13:32 -0700, Brion Vibber wrote:
> > Ok, I've killed the iOS version as well.
>
> There's a "Commons App" product in bugzilla.wikimedia.org with 213
> tickets, 82 of them open.
> There is also an "Unofficial Apps" product in Bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Unofficial%20Apps
>
> What would you like to see happen in Bugzilla? Move tickets from
> 'Commons App' to a new component under 'Unofficial'? All lowest
> priority? Should Brion really be default assignee for all those
> 'Unofficial' tickets?
>
> andre
> --
> Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
> http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mobile-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
>



-- 
Dan Garry
Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l

Reply via email to