> I'd like to know how the image linked above could be considered helpful to a reader.
Regarding this specific querry: We have actually tested this. We spoke to a few users and seeing the combination of an image, the title and the wikidata description immensely helps visual learners. Not all users learn by reading text. For example: This is especially important for articles related to flora fauna. Hope this helps Vibha ---- Vibha Bamba Senior Designer | WMF Design On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 19 December 2014 at 19:22, Dan Garry <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Given the above, we're not going to block releasing the feature because > of > > this. > > I'm very disappointed to hear that. > > > It's such a massive step forwards in terms of visual appeal > > I beg to disagree. This: > > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia_mobile_app_beta_bug_-_2014-12-18_-_06.png > > is not "a step forwards in terms of visual appeal"; much less a > "massive" one; it's a retrograde step that makes the encyclopedia look > slipshod and amateur. > > > our goals are based on readership > > I'd like to know how the image linked above could be considered > helpful to a reader. > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Mobile-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
