Eh, please don't - have you tried it for languages other than English? 09 февр. 2015 г. 5:55 пользователь "Dmitry Brant" <[email protected]> написал:
> Awesome! I would love to see the output of AutoDesc be returned by the > API, when a manual description is not available. > I would also be a strong proponent of fully auto-generated descriptions > for all articles. (The data is right there!) > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Erik Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: > >> See https://tools.wmflabs.org/autodesc for the new API described in the >> post. Interesting at least as a fallback to human-written descriptions... >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Magnus Manske <[email protected]> >> Date: Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:41 AM >> Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] descriptions in mobile app >> To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." < >> [email protected]> >> >> >> Manual descriptions are, in the vast majority of cases, a waste of >> volunteer time. Alternative: >> http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=265 >> >> >> On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 17:37:42 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hoi, >>> How does that help ? The point is exactly that there is no point to >>> descriptions. Why iterate on a dog it will still be a mutt. >>> Thanks, >>> GerardM >>> >>> On 8 February 2015 at 14:07, Amir E. Aharoni < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'd rather see it not as something terribly disappointing, but as an >>>> opportunity to find a way to fill item descriptions more efficiently. >>>> >>>> Basically, to find some cycles to resolve >>>> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T64695 >>>> בתאריך 8 בפבר 2015 10:33, "Gerard Meijssen" <[email protected]> >>>> כתב: >>>> >>>>> Hoi, >>>>> I understand that item descriptions are going to be used in a mobile >>>>> app. In my opinion that is seriously disappointing because it is not >>>>> realistic to expect enough coverage in any language. Particularly in the >>>>> small languages it will not be really useful. >>>>> >>>>> My question is: we have had automated descriptions for a long time. >>>>> What is it that they makes that they are not used.? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> GerardM >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Erik Möller >> VP of Product & Strategy, Wikimedia Foundation >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mobile-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mobile-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l > >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
