I would imagine that the Android team will adopt these criteria, as well. It hasn't been much of an issue so far, since we've only needed to import one new library within the last year, but it will be good to have these guidelines specified officially.
-Dmitry On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Dan Garry <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks good. > > Is this currently being trialled as a set of criteria which will then also > be adopted by the Android guys as well, or are they drafting their own > criteria? > > Dan > > On 12 February 2015 at 16:46, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Following up, here's where we arrived: >> >> >> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Apps/Team/iOS/Third_Party_Libraries >> >> -Adam >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The apps crew is going to be having a meeting to go over third party >>> library usage in iOS. We're currently use CocoaPods for package management. >>> >>> In advance of that meeting tomorrow, anybody have advice we should >>> consider? >>> >>> -Adam >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mobile-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l >> >> > > > -- > Dan Garry > Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Mobile-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l > >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
