+1 to being generic. For example if you look at Echo, the *Collaboration
team* is on the maintainers.

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks! I added it to my subpage and assigned it to Reading Design.
> Assuming comments on this thread taper off soon, I'll figure out how to get
> this stuff added into
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers . I think in the
> Maintainers column we'll want to be generic and point to the particular
> team if someone isn't actively maintaining it, but otherwise point to a
> person who we know to be actively developing *plus* the particular team.
>
> -Adam
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Volker Eckl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There are currently plans on deploying skin Blueprint on mediawiki.org
>> <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T93613>. Besides my work on UI
>> Standardization I'll also continue to work on the skin. I think Blueprint
>> should be on that list.
>>
>> Best,
>> Volker
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Would you please share this on the list?
>>>
>>> On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Volker Eckl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>> there are currently plans on deploying skin Blueprint on mediawiki.org
>>>> <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T93613>. Besides my work on UI
>>>> Standardization I'll also continue to work on Blueprint. Although UI
>>>> Standardization is a "special case", formally we belong to Reading and
>>>> therefore I think Blueprint should be on that list.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Volker
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Adam Baso <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all -
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been reviewing a list of extensions with Reading Engineering and
>>>>> Reading Infrastructure leads - props to James Forrester for promoting this
>>>>> discussion. Here's a list of extensions we believe currently falls under
>>>>> Reading for triage (n.b., not all extensions will get active development
>>>>> support).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:ABaso_(WMF)/Extension_Responsibility
>>>>>
>>>>> Presuming no major issues with this, I think we should move the page
>>>>> to mw:Reading/Extension_Responsibility.
>>>>>
>>>>> One important outstanding question:
>>>>>
>>>>> Is MultimediaViewer appropriate for Reading given its
>>>>> consumption-oriented nature? Or is this actually better suited to Editing
>>>>> (where there exists a team named Multimedia)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Some other notes:
>>>>>
>>>>> * For skins with low utilization, we in time probably should
>>>>> coordinate handover to interested community members (or discuss with
>>>>> community members practical approaches for EOL).
>>>>>
>>>>> * Regarding the Nostalgia skin, we believe it's only used on
>>>>> https://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/wiki/HomePage, so maintenance would
>>>>> be updating for breaking skin changes or security issues only.
>>>>>
>>>>> * JsonConfig, ZeroBanner, ZeroPortal - we'll need to examine this more
>>>>> closely. Yuri (who has deepest PHP knowledge on extensions) is now over in
>>>>> Discovery, Jeff (JS & Lua) is in Reading, and now I'm managing instead of
>>>>> writing lots of code.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Collection probably belongs in Services
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mobile-l mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mobile-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mobile-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l

Reply via email to