Thanks Jon, lots of interesting stuff even with such little amount of data. Are we planning to take this out of beta now?
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Jon Katz <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Baha. > > I think the following reinforces your point, but just to clarify, the only > reason I compared beta to stable was to identify if any of the anomalies we > saw in beta (decrease in beta pvs, huge spike in 'random' clicks) were > artifacts of beta adoption or were attributable to normal traffic trends. > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Bahodir Mansurov < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 10:07 -0700, Jon Katz wrote: >> > We need to either increase beta users, a/b test, or test in stable >> > more (which would also mean a/b testing on a small % of the >> > population) >> >> Thanks, Jon for the write up. I strongly believe this is the way >> forward for our future experiments. Comparing beta results to stable >> doesn't make much sense. >> >> Baha >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Mobile-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l > >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
