That sounds like a very good idea for labels.

Not quite a game, but I have something along those lines running for a
while. Example: Monet.
http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/cloudy_concept.php?q=Q296&lang=en

Every time a label is set in a language, it would potentially improve
dozens or hundreds of auto-descriptions. Which is one reason why we should
NOT flood the manual description field with one-off text generation; they
need to be updated, and figuring out which descriptions we can overwrite is
next-to-impossible.


On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 1:17 PM Jane Darnell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well we should start by filling blank descriptions of course. I should
> have gone on to explain that in my experience of using listeria lists in my
> userspace on the Dutch wikipedia, I have noticed lots of Wikidata
> infrastructure that hasn't been translated yet. So in my example of the
> Monet painting, in some languages it would not look like "creator
> Monet|instance painting" but like "Qxyz Monet|Qefg Qklm" (worst case
> scenario where only the item for Monet has been propagated to all 200+
> languages). Having a game where such auto descriptions can be served to
> people who are able to fill in labels and descriptions could be useful for
> more than just the one item.
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Magnus Manske <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ah, but when auto-descriptions get better, how do we know which should be
>> updated, and which have been "improved" bu humans? Because people will
>> screem bloody murder if we replace "their" descriptions with automatic
>> ones, even if those are better.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 7:53 AM Jane Darnell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes but even if the descriptions were just the contents of fields
>>> separated by a pipe it would be better than nothing. This could be a prompt
>>> to make a game that offers to update the description with an auto-generated
>>> text. So for a Monet painting, the description could be "creator
>>> Monet|instance painting". We have over 100,000 paintings on Wikidata thanks
>>> to the Sum of all Paintings project (yay!) and most museums only have
>>> titles in the language it was created in and the language of the museum, so
>>> we are a looooong way from creating meaningful titles for all of these and
>>> meaningful short descriptions would be a real benefit to the project.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Lydia Pintscher <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Dan Garry <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > I've seen arguments on both sides here. Some say automatically
>>>> generated
>>>> > descriptions are not good enough. Some say they are. Why don't we
>>>> gather
>>>> > some data on this and use that to decide what's right? :-)
>>>>
>>>> Please do. Especially pay attention to languages other than English
>>>> though. Because even if we get algorithms to write good descriptions
>>>> for English are we going to do the same for all the other languages?
>>>> Especially those where grammar is tricky and Wikidata doesn't even
>>>> have the necessary information to make the grammar right? The other
>>>> tricky side is determining why something is actually notable. That's
>>>> not a trivial thing to determine based on the data we have.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Lydia
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
>>>> Product Manager for Wikidata
>>>>
>>>> Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
>>>> Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24
>>>> 10963 Berlin
>>>> www.wikimedia.de
>>>>
>>>> Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
>>>>
>>>> Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
>>>> unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das
>>>> Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mobile-l mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mobile-l mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l

Reply via email to