Thanks for thinking through this, Jon. I think I made something unclear--responses inline. In green to make reading easier:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Jon Robson <[email protected]> wrote: > Jon thanks so much for writing this up and thanks Joaquin for putting it > on the wiki (you beat me to it :)) > > I'm a little confused to the meaning of "tag impression" - does it mean > they rendered or that the user saw them? > User saw them, or, more specifically, appeared on screen. > If the latter... > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reading/Web/Projects/Categories_Browse#/media/File:Browse-Views_and_clickthrough.png > suggests that 50% of the time a reader saw a tag (.45% of the time) (there > was a tag impression) they clicked on them (0.18%). Am I misunderstanding > what tag impression means? > Sorry, this graph is a little confusing because it has 2 axes. The red (impressions) corresponds to the right axis and the blue (% click-through) is the left- axis. So, the way to read it is that there were ~50,000 impressions a day, and the click-thru rate was .18%. This means that for every ~1000 times a tag appeared to a user, ~2 clicks occurred. The question of what % of pageviews resulted in an 'impression' is a really good one - I think it could be easily looked up using the pageview_hourly table. > > Is this a fair summary?: > "When the tags were __visible__ to the user, 30-50% of the time they > clicked through to the "category page". On this page only 40% of visits > resulted in a click to an article in the list. > No--for reasons explained above. > > To me this is significant traffic... especially if made more visible. > I personally would expect normal link traffic to be higher and for this to > be a new source of engagement. > Yes, it would be hard to get higher click-through than our current engagement model, but anything additive represents not only massive numbers, but an opportunity to have our users increasingly think of us as a place to learn (rather than a simple question and answer) > > Can we clarify this on the wiki page and in this thread as I fear I'm > misunderstanding something..? > Yes--will add clarity to the graph on wiki. It might be awhile, however, before I have the brain and time to execute the query your question brought up of "what % of total pages lead to the tag being shown"? This will just as easily be answered by the read more data you will be implementing. > > Other questions: > * What was the number of clicks to tags per visit? (were being opening new > tabs or clicking on one?) > I don't understand this question. I know we can't track 'visits'.
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
