Hi Rupert,
Thanks for your input.  I agree that the switch should sit at the page
level rather than creating a universal setting.
-J

On Monday, December 14, 2015, rupert THURNER <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I like the idea. Where you envision to let the user switch easy between
> simple and normal? I d love to do this easy for every article not as a
> general setting.
>
> Rupert
> On Dec 11, 2015 21:13, "Jon Katz" <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> TLDR: want to introduce the idea of surfacing simple english version of
>> wikipedia in a more prominent way to test if this appeals to our readers.
>>  no timeline, no action items, just an intro to the concept and a request
>> for feedback/suggestions.
>>
>> *Bakground:*
>> As a refresher/summary, as part of the reading team's strategic process
>> <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reading/Strategy>, we identified 4
>> reading strategies that we are exploring and want to test hypothesis that
>> will help us determine which strategies are more impactful.
>>
>> I am reviewing our strategy tests (i.e. tests that can help us determine
>> if a particular strategy is one we should focus on) and came across some
>> notes I made with Abbey (copied) around the potential strategy "Guided
>> Educational Experiences" that I wanted to surface and run by you. This
>> potential strategy is one where the reading team focuses on enhancing
>> learning (comprehension and/or retention) of content.  Ideas in this theme
>> include identifying prerequisite articles, a suggested order to reading
>> articles (curricula), simple or practical versions of articles, quizzes or
>> even games. To be clear, this is a potential strategy that we are
>> evaluating along with others, as described here
>> <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reading/Strategy/Strategy_Process/Testing#About>.
>> I also want to acknowledge that there have likely been other experiments in
>> this area--if you have specific examples you would like to share, please do
>> so.  The test proposed below came about from one such awareness.
>>
>> *The test:*
>> One idea for this strategy was "simplified versions of
>> articles"--versions of articles for readers who were unfamiliar with the
>> topic or lacked a basic educational foundation.  That wikipedia articles
>> are sometimes to advanced is not a novel observation, but it's a tough nut
>> to crack.
>>
>> We had originally framed the test as "will editors want to create
>> simplified versions of articles" and we planned on asking them.  However
>> the work that James Helman is doing with editors translating medical
>> documents into more practical guides in Swahili [link?] seems to show there
>> is interest here.  However, we felt that SimpleEnglish was, in itself, a
>> remarkable test of what is being proposed, even though its focus is on
>> simple wording rather than concept simplicity. The most often-cited problem
>> (anecdote) with SimpleEnglish is that very few readers can find it.  This
>> makes sense: someone confused by sophisticated vocabulary or looking for a
>> summary of an article is not likely to check the language list to see if a
>> simple version of the article sits there.
>>
>> So the proposed test would be to surface simple english in a more
>> prominent way and to test if this led to higher comprehension using either
>> quick surveys or a proxy, like pageviews. I added the broad outlines of the
>> test to our strategy test document, here
>> <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reading/Strategy/Strategy_Process/Testing#Create_deep-dive_.28guided.29_educational_experience>
>> .
>>
>> *The ask:*
>> This is not part of our proposed Q3 plans or even our Q4 plans, but I
>> would like to hear feedback and ideas around how we could effectively
>> integrate it into our plans.  One idea would be to implement it on one of
>> the apps, first, since we can move things around there without disturbing
>> as many people.  We are open to suggestions.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> J
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mobile-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l

Reply via email to