It depends on the country where you expect visitors. In many european countries, DSL connections are everyday more common, and the speed is increasing constantly. Normally images are heavier.
Ryan Nichols schrieb: > I wouldn't use it for any publicly facing websites that receives general > traffic. For applications it's just fine, especially if it's a tool that > has repeated use. Anything else, like an e-commerce site, is probably a > no-no. > > Ryan Nichols > Apples To Oranges > www.apples-to-oranges.com <http://www.apples-to-oranges.com> > > Yehuda Katz wrote: > > What would you guys say is the practical maximum size javascript file > > you'd want to load with a page? > > > > At this point, I'd like to use: > > Mochikit (100k) > > Mochikit Scriptaculous Port (50k -- maybe a bit smaller if compressed) > > IE7 (30k) > > > > Is that too much? Won't it cause serious problems for visitors with > > dialup? > > > > Then again, doesn't a 100k file cause serious problems for visitors > > with dialup? > > > > I understand that the file gets cached after the first use, but even > > so, is it acceptable? > > > > I'd love some general feedback. > > > > > >
