On Jul 7, 2006, at 4:18 PM, John Wang wrote:

On 7/6/06, Yaakov Nemoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it begs the question though, why does the server need to
differentiate between different Ajax libraries?  In fact, the only
thing that we should differentiate is whether it's an XMLHttpRequest
or not, and even that might not be appropriate.

I agree this is best in theory and that's what I wanted before I started seeing libraries doing different things.
 
Your suggestion does make sense, so make that change if you want,
especially if that gets ported into MochiKit.  Better to have it
standardized.  I can already tell someone will try to do something
differently, and we're gonna have to suffer with the idiot decision.

I talked to Alex Russell of Dojo about this and he agreed this would be useful and should be standardized. We discussed using a shorter name and he came up with X-Ajax-Engine . Although neither of us are crazy about using 'Ajax' in the name it is short and fairly unambiguious. He also mentioned he could bring this up at the OpenAjax Alliance.

What does everyone think?

That sounds reasonable to me. The names aren't that important, all it needs is buy-in from developers making stuff.

Hell, the HTTP spec misspells Referer [sic], using ajax in the name definitely isn't any worse than that :)

-bob


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to