"Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There's always the chance of getting the same random number twice.. A > timestamp with enough precision is generally better. It's *extremely* > unlikely that a single user is going to get the same exact timestamp > twice... there would have to be something seriously wrong with their > UA for that to happen.
What's the precision for the timestamp? If it doesn't get to at least milliseconds then it starts being a problem with daylight saving time, when the time change occurs. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
