Then why not just have appendChildNode, instead of appendChildNodes? I
figure that since right now, passing an array to removeElement is an
error, adding the new capability wouldn't hurt as it wouldn't be
surprising to anyone.
On Feb 11, 1:02 pm, "Arnar Birgisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mochikit seems to be getting a lot of requests like these (may of them
> from myself). As Bob has previously pointed out, making functions do
> different things is bad so in this case a new function would be
> better, buuut...
>
> I think there is no need in this case since one can always do this:
>
> map(removeElement, elements);
>
> Maybe someone needs to come up with the Zen of Mochikit. :o)
>
> Arnar
>
> On 2/11/07, Aaron Faanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > should removeElement have the ability to remove multiple elements?
>
> > /** @id MochiKit.DOM.removeElement */
> > removeElement: function (elem) {
> > if(elem instanceof Array) {
> > for(var i=0;i<elem.length; i++) {
> > MochiKit.DOM.removeElement(elem[i]);
> > }
> > return;
> > }
> > var e = MochiKit.DOM.getElement(elem);
> > e.parentNode.removeChild(e);
> > return e;
> > },
>
> > or, alternatively:
>
> > /** @id MochiKit.DOM.removeElement */
> > removeElement: function (elem) {
> > if(arguments.length > 1) {
> > for(var i=0;i<arguments.length; i++) {
> > MochiKit.DOM.removeElement(arguments[i]);
> > }
> > return;
> > }
> > var e = MochiKit.DOM.getElement(elem);
> > e.parentNode.removeChild(e);
> > return e;
> > },
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MochiKit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
