On Feb 28, 11:24 am, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> MochiKit is practical code, extracted from real projects, written by
> the people who built those projects. Our roadmap is to incorporate
> whatever generic functionality that we've built in our own projects
> that would be useful to other people. There's no overall goal other
> than to maintain the high quality of the implementation and
> documentation while we grow new functionality.
Are contributions welcome?
>
> It's also hard to say that MochiKit "isn't really being developed"
> when there's a huge body of new code. There just haven't been any
> releases. The 1.4 release is imminent, but all of us are also very
> busy with our own companies.
I understand about being busy.
>
> Compared to Prototype it appears inactive? I don't think you're paying
> much attention to Prototype :) And what's their roadmap for future
> enhancements? It's nice that they finally got around to writing
> documentation after two years, but I have fundamental and practical
> problems with the way that library extends JavaScript objects.
I haven't been paying much attention to any JavaScript libraries until
recently (prior to this project, I was doing desktop solutions). I'm
just doing some background research now, hence my initial post. It's
hard to evaluate the status of a project other than looking at the
activity on the mailing list, updates to the website, and general
noise about the project on the web. From that I determined prototype
might be more active than MochiKit. It appears I'm wrong ;-)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MochiKit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
