AJAX implies XMLHttpRequest. IFRAMEs are different. You can do many similar things with them, but it's not the same. The server has to respond differently.
MochiKit has no native support for using IFRAME as a transport, but you can always write your own (it's not very hard). Dojo has some sort of IFRAME transport support, I'm not sure which other frameworks do. Have you found that many users are using IE6 with ActiveX disabled but JavaScript turned on? Shouldn't this number be decreasing significantly now that IE7 is basically a forced upgrade and has XHR built-in? It seems like it may be a little late to start caring about a relatively obscure configuration of a dying browser. -bob On 3/30/07, dmcewan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Currently on our website (http://www.reunion.com) we use the IFRAME > workaround and our AJAX works fine when ActiveX is turned off on IE6. > You can check it out and see the solution on the site (the javascript > isn't obfuscated, or I'll send/post it for you). It seems to work > fine, but I am not as well versed in the crazy world of AJAX as you > are. Is this solution not compatible with MochiKit? Or is it > undesirable in other ways? > > - David > > > > On Mar 29, 5:51 pm, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/29/07, dmcewan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm researching different AJAX frameworks and I was wondering if > > > anybody has tested mochikits AJAX calls still function correctly? > > > > No framework will be able to do AJAX calls in IE 6 ifActiveXis > > turned off. It's not technically possible. > > > > -bob > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
