Wouldn't the solution just be to update mochikit.com to indicate that the project is stable, maintained silently in the background and isn't seeking to do active, steady releases due to already fulfilling its original function?
A lot of software projects end up growing out of control after too many contributions, and one reason that I personally stick with MochiKit is that it's not constantly being reinvented as something bigger, better, more encompassing. It's also not advertised in the same way as Prototype, et al. In fact, I was more of a fan of MochiKit's "identity" when I first discovered it and the tagline was something to the effect of "MochiKit helps you get shit done, fast"; it sounded more efficient and DIY when compared to the alternatives, and frankly exuded more confidence than "makes javascript suck less". I'd rather get shit done faster than just suck a little bit less. -Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
