Oops, that should probably be arguments[0]
On Dec 17, 2007 2:00 PM, Kevin Damm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe use MochiKit.Base.merge or MochiKit.Base.update:
>
> function CHECKBOX() {
> return INPUT.apply(this, update(arguments, {'type': "checkbox"}));
> }
>
> - Kevin
>
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 1:30 PM, machineghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > I recently found myself doing this a lot:
> > var a = INPUT({type:"textbox"});
> > var b = INPUT({type:"checkbox"});
> > var c = INPUT({type:"hidden"});
> > etc.
> >
> > So I wanted to make short-hand functions like CHECKBOX and HIDDEN
> > which would work exactly like INPUT, only with a pre-specified type.
> > At first I thought I could do this:
> > CHECKBOX = createDOMFunc("input", {type:"checkbox"});
> >
> > but that eliminated all other attributes (since the {type:"checkbox"}
> > replaced my attributes argument). I played around a bit, and
> > eventually found that I could make it work with:
> > function CHECKBOX(){
> > arguments[0]["type"] = "checkbox";
> > return INPUT.apply(this, arguments);
> > }
> >
> > But that doesn't seem very MochiKit-ish to me, so I was wondering if
> > there was a cleaner way to do the above using bind or partial or
> > something. Also, I was curious as to how people feel about these
> > short-hand functions, and whether or not they'd be useful enough to
> > include in MochiKit.DOM.
> >
> > Any thoughts/feedback would be appreciated.
> > Jeremy
> >
> >
> >
> > So my question is, is th
> > > >
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MochiKit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
