On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 22:54, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should keep deep object names, JSON data structures are
> often nested a little bit and it's nice to be able to work with them
> as-is without creating a new object just to flatten it out.
I was about to say the same, the dot syntax immediately looks very useful to me.
> As far as nested replacements go, I think we can ditch that safely.
> I've never really wanted to use that.
I agree, I think this would be a lesser used feature. Having said
that, I think it is maybe not too hard to implement, simply parse
{...} as a valid format, look up the argument set the format string to
its contents, and proceed as normally.
Apart from the above, +1 for me.
cheers,
Arnar
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MochiKit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
