Johnny Mnemonic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i was checking out the cvs but i had some problems to compile it
> when i run the builddtcl.sh script (after editing it) i get errors
> for the VERSION file (missing) but required for the
> -DDTCL_VERSION=\"`cat VERSION`\" Am i wrong or the file should be
> there? I did an echo 0.9.0 > VERSION for temp, but the real version
> should be decided by our dear developer :)
Hmm, yeah. I should probably check out the raw sources more often, so
I don't get confused by the cruft in my own directory:-)
> I also have to quick fixes for the src:
> --- apache_multipart_buffer.c~ Mon Feb 19 19:37:57 2001
> +++ apache_multipart_buffer.c Mon Feb 19 19:38:55 2001
> @@ -182,7 +182,6 @@
> /* finds a boundary */
> int find_boundary(multipart_buffer *self, char *boundary)
> {
> - int len, bound_len = strlen(boundary);
> char *line;
>
> /* loop thru lines */
I'll see what they do with this upstream, although it looks ok. Those
files are taken from the Apache apreq efforts.
> --- mod_dtcl.c~ Mon Feb 19 19:37:00 2001
> +++ mod_dtcl.c Mon Feb 19 19:38:55 2001
> @@ -872,7 +872,7 @@
> #if THREADED_TCL == 0
> tcl_init_stuff(s, p);
> #endif
> - ap_add_version_component("mod_dtcl");
> + ap_add_version_component("mod_dtcl/" DTCL_VERSION);
> }
>
> const char *set_script(cmd_parms *cmd, void *dummy, char *arg, char *arg2)
>
> ---
> (why not to show the mod_tcl version in the apache?)
I used to do this, but decided that maybe it's best not too. If there
were ever a big security problem, why show people which sites are
vulnerable?
Thanks!
--
David N. Welton
Personal: http://www.efn.org/~davidw/
Free Software: http://people.debian.org/~davidw/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
