At 13.06 15/03/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > Since apache doesn't need to be recompiled for loading the mod_dtcl as a
> > shared module, why don't we include the apache header in the mod_dtcl
>tree?
> > Then, a user won't need the apache src for adding dtcl to his server..
> >
>
>Pardon me if I am totally incorrect, but I don't think it is just one
>header. That is one header that sucks in a bunch of other headers, with
>several platform specific header files (os.h) also being required. And how
>do we keep those headers in sync with changes in the Apache sources ?
Of course, the Apache headers would be contained in its own dir (and subdirs)
And what is the problem in synching with changes in the Apache sources?
They actually don't
release a new version each day.. so just cp -a src/include...
>And, speaking for the Windows minority, we need the Apache sources around in
>any case, in order to make a usable link library.
I have no idea about this
Anyway, adding include files is only a comfort for those who are only
interested in compiling and running this module. I can't imagine a reason
because someone could want to compile statically the module into the apache
(if dynamic modules are supported)
The configure script will accept the includes' dir in the command line, and
if not provided will
use his own ones.
>Not trying to butt in, just trying to point out some possible issues.
You are welcome :)
____________________________________
Johnny Mnemonic©
E-Mail Address:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
