Some exciting news!Good.I've been talking with Damon Courtney, maintainer of NeoWebScript, and
he is interested in combining efforts, starting mostly from the
mod_dtcl code base.
I'm quite enthusiastic about this, as it would mean someone else withMy only wish (and concern, too) is that mod_dtcl won't trade off speed for
a lot of experience dedicated to this project, as well as an influx of
new ideas. Damon has got some good thoughts about adding useful
packages to the system, as well as adding a few things from NWS.I wanted to check and see how opinions run regarding this? Concerns?
Things you'd like to see?
new features. Remember that most potential mod_dtcl users are people with
a large base of Tcl scripts and applications that run as CGI and, as a first
approach, they will try a 'quick port' with a minimal rewrite of their code.
This is not an issue, at this point of the development, IMO.
I don't see it as being %100 backwards compatible, but I will try my
hardest to make sure there is an upgrade path.
And of course, we need a name for it... Suggestions?:-)NeoTclModApacheWebQuickScript is too long? :)
What about NeoTcl ?
-- Valerio Gionco [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] MOST s.r.l. Via Bezzecca, 9 - 10131 Torino ************************************************************************ "Life's not fair, but the root password helps."
