It seems like good production code to me. I've built a production system on
it since February and that bug a couple days ago is the only one I've ever
traced back to it. I can't say that for the M$ systems I've worked with.
Looking forward to trying Rivet in the future, whenever Apache 2.0 starts
coming with Red Hat and I move up to it.
Speaking of that, you might double-check the site at tcl.apache.org. I
think there was one place on there where it (mis)quoted Rivet as being for
Apache 1.3.
--
Mark Hubbard: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"...where they have failed, you will succeed."
- Morpheus
----- Original Message -----
From: David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: 1.0 release - RFC
>
> I am planning on preparing a 1.0 release for sometime this week.
>
> What this means, more than anything, is that mod_dtcl is pretty much
> stable the way it is, and won't be changing a lot in the future,
> unless more volunteers come forward. Development, new ideas, and new
> code will be going into Rivet (which I encourage everyone to try out).
>
> I am going to integrate the changes necessary to compile dtcl with Tcl
> 8.4, but beyond that, don't really have a lot of extra things I plan
> on doing.
>
> Is there anything that you think *has* to go in? Is everyone ok with
> the idea of a 1.0 release?
>
> Thankyou,
> --
> David N. Welton
> Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/
> Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
> Free Software: http://www.dedasys.com/freesoftware/
> Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
