Henry, you are contradicting yourself my friend: I started doing CF with MG and I have no experience with the other MVC frameworks. However, I can't believe MG xml seems like almost the Most verbose out of all the frameworks.
Since you have no experience with any other MVC framework, of course MG seems the most verbose. If you were a "The Glass Is Half Full" kinda guy, you could also say that in your experience, MG is the LEAST verbose. The question you should ask yourself is, is it better to declare certain functionality in XML or reimplement processes in CFML? DW On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 6:36 PM, henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know the Galleon Forum Ports Comparisons has been posted for a while > now, http://on.tapogee.com/galleonproject/comparison.html , but I just > happen to read it today. > > I started doing CF with MG and I have no experience with the other MVC > frameworks. However, I can't believe MG xml seems like almost the > Most verbose out of all the frameworks. > > What do you guys think of onTap as a framework from a MG user pov? > > > Henry Ho > http://henrylearnstorock.blogspot.com/ > > > -- "Come to the edge, he said. They said: We are afraid. Come to the edge, he said. They came. He pushed them and they flew." Guillaume Apollinaire quotes --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "model-glue" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/model-glue?hl=en For more about Model-Glue, check http://www.model-glue.com . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
