Has anyone know if there are performance gains from MG2 to MG3?
I have a site I'm about to launch and will be upgrading to MG3 as some point but if there are performance gains I may bring the upgrade forward. --- James Allen E: [email protected] Blog: http://jamesallen.name Twitter: @CFJamesAllen (Coldfusion / Web development) Twitter: @jamesallenuk (General) From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roy Martin Sent: 16 July 2009 17:13 To: [email protected] Subject: [Model-Glue] Re: Performance improvements between MG 1.0 and MG 3.0 Bob, >From our experience the biggest improvements came from also updating the methodology. That is to say MG1 was pretty early on in ColdSpring development and although it was possible to still utilize it for the most part all of our model objects were being manually instantiated within the controller / application. We moved over several large e-commerce sites to the MG:2 code base, converted all of the objects over to ColdSpring and saw a huge improvement. On one system that had ~40 objects (model layer code) we saw the average load time at 400-700 ms in production. Upgrading to MG:2 and converting them we saw the total load time in production decrease to 75-100 ms. The total time to upgrade was pretty minimal at about 2 hrs. We have many less resource intensive sites though that still run MG:1 with 100-200ms response rates. Word to the wise is make sure that you update all your controller code to point to the MG2 framework controller as well (what framework the controller extends). Thanks, Roy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "model-glue" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/model-glue?hl=en For more about Model-Glue, check http://www.model-glue.com . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
