Wayne,
While I see the technical point Ed Willink is making about which version
of Guava he should PB CQ, given that ranges (or the unbounded range) are
involved in the requirement and at install/runtime could be
installed/wired with any version, I feel it's splitting hairs in a way
that creates extra work for everyone involved to open a PB CQ for every
version of Guava known to mankind. The 15.0 version is the one on the
Neon train (and is approved), and I approved the 19.0 (latest) version.
I don't see all other modeling projects creating a flood of PB CQs in
these cases, nor to I want to see that. It seems superfluous, so I'll
draw the line with this workflow based on the expectation that each
project will file a single PB CQ a given library they are using for
their release. Technically, looking at the OCL repo, they are not
actually redistributing Guava in the repository, but the project is on
the train, so it will generally install with Guava 15.0.0. Approving
that CQ is sufficient from my point of view.
Regards,
Ed
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
