Hi Ed, I guess that on your turn you misinterpreted my email that was a real question (may be naiv) and for sure not a bad critic.
Best. Sebastien. Envoyé depuis mon smartphone Samsung Galaxy. -------- Message d'origine -------- De : Ed Merks <[email protected]> Date : 26/09/2017 09:21 (GMT+01:00) À : [email protected] Objet : Re: [modeling-pmc] UML2 and Photon Sebastien I think you are misinterpreting "require UML2's extended GenModel to take action" as synonymous with "the changes are bad." Any change (good or bad) to the GenModel.ecore affects (at least potentially) UML's extended GenModel implementation. http://git.eclipse.org/c/emf/org.eclipse.emf.git/log/plugins/org.eclipse.emf.codegen.ecore/model/GenModel.ecore Also any change to templates (good or bad) affects (at least potentially) UML's specialized templates: http://git.eclipse.org/c/emf/org.eclipse.emf.git/log/plugins/org.eclipse.emf.codegen.ecore/templates/model/Class.javajet We can all be thankful (and I certainly am!) that Itemis consistently sponsors my contributions and that Dennis Hübner of TypeFox does the Releng work on my behalf. Note that lack of signing support for Buckminster builds will become a significant problem for someone, or perhaps everyone, when the foundation disables that service. Regards, Ed On 26.09.2017 08:03, GERARD Sebastien wrote: Hi Ed, Can you tell me what are the changes that have been made and will be bad for photon w.r.t. EMF generator part? Thanks. Best. Seb. Envoyé depuis mon smartphone Samsung Galaxy. -------- Message d'origine -------- De : Ed Merks <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Date : 25/09/2017 18:11 (GMT+01:00) À : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Objet : Re: [modeling-pmc] UML2 and Photon Kenn, That's pretty bad for Papyrus, parts of OCL, and parts of EMF Compare. :-( And I'm not sure which other release-train parts are downstream of those parts... Downstream consumers should note that parts of UML2 (i.e., the generator parts) don't work with the latest EMF (i.e., the generator parts of it) because any changes I make to the GenModel (and I made many changes recently) require UML2's extended GenModel to take action. So we can't just feed the Oxygen version of UML2 into the Photon train (at least not all of UML2's parts). Regards, Ed On 25.09.2017 16:54, Kenn Hussey wrote: PMC, I just wanted to give you a heads up that there are currently no plans for UML2 to participate in the upcoming Photon simultaneous release, due to lack of funding. Unfortunately, this means that dependencies will break when the aggregation file is disabled by the EMO immediately following M4. If anyone is interested (or knows someone who might be interested) in helping ensure that UML2 is kept up to date and that it can participate in the Photon release, please reach out to me directly. Thanks, Kenn _______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc _______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
