+1

On 02.03.2022 15:03, EMO EMO wrote:
Dear PMC,
this is a kind reminder to provide your feedback about the *Eclipse RMF <https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.mdt.rmf/reviews/2022.03-progress-review> *in the corresponding GitLab Issue <https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/emo/-/issues/196>.
Thanks in advance.
Maria Teresa Delgado

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:58 PM EMO EMO <[email protected]> wrote:

    Dear Modeling PMC,

    we are currently going through a Progress Review for the *Eclipse
    RMF
    
<https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.mdt.rmf/reviews/2022.03-progress-review>*
 project.

    Our intention with this review is to experiment with a different
    way of applying the Eclipse Foundation Development Process (EDP).
    We hope that we will use what we learn of this experience to
    ultimately reduce the administrative burden on our open source
    projects while helping them fully adopt the practices of the EDP.

    The notion of progress reviews were added to the EDP some time
    ago. Progress reviews are like release reviews, except that they
    are not aligned with any particular release. As it is with
    release reviews, following a successful progress review, a project
    is considered "in good standing" for a year (and so may make as
    many releases during that time frame as needed).

    With this in mind, *we kindly request your participation in
    this progress review, by assessing the section dedicated to the
    PMC in the following GitLab issue:*
    https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/emo/-/issues/196

    Below, there is a preview of the section that needs your
    attention, we've added some pointers and suggestions on how to
    evaluate projects engaging in Progress Reviews. *You won't be able
    to tick the boxes on the GitLab issue, but we invite you to
    provide your feedback on the comments.*

    Also, suggestions to improve the template we've created are welcome.

    Thank you in advance for your collaboration.


            Open Source Rules of Engagement

        /To be completed by the PMC in the case of Progress Reviews./

      *  PMC approval on the mailing list

        General:

      *  Project is operating within the mission and scope defined in
        its top-level project’s charter
      *  Project is operating within the bounds of its own scope
      *  Project is operating in an open and transparent manner
      *  Overall the project is operating according to the Eclipse
        Development Process.

        Things to check:

      * Communication channels advertised
      * Advertised communication channels used
      * Committers are responding to questions
      * Committers are responding to issues
      * Committers are responding to pull/merge/review requests


-- *The Eclipse Management Organization|*Eclipse Foundation



--
*The Eclipse Management Organization|*Eclipse Foundation

_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc

Reply via email to