(BCC) Henrik,
Committers should be elected based on their contribution track record.
So this justification is just not sufficient:
Linus works as a student at PROTOS and started to contribute to the
eTrice project, in particular in an overhaul of the example models.
It does not matter where someone works and one does elect a committer
because they are starting to contribute. Someone can review the
student's contributions, and when there is a proven track record, then
an election makes sense.
Even if I approved this election, the EMO is likely to reject it.
Regards,
Ed
On 30.01.2024 11:59, emo--- via modeling-pmc wrote:
A committer election for Linus Mahrenholtz on project Eclipse eTrice
(modeling.mdt.etrice) was started by Henrik Rentz-Reichert with this
criteria:
Linus works as a student at PROTOS and started to contribute to the
eTrice
project, in particular in an overhaul of the example models.
It is my pleasure to nominate Linus as a committer on Eclipse eTrice.
Eclipse eTrice project committers can click the election link below to
vote.
Election:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.mdt.etrice/elections/election-linus-mahrenholtz-committer-eclipse-etrice
Project: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.mdt.etrice
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
