On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 18:26 +0000, Jerry Hicks wrote: > Thanks Aleksander (and happy holidays!) > > Wondering what you might think about text messaging on Verizon's LTE > with the MC74XX modules? > > As I loosely understand things, Verizon requires a connection to > their IPv6 VZWIMS network for text messaging on LTE to work.
SMS over IMS probably, and on VZW it's going to use IPv6 too. In any case, SMS-over-IMS uses SIP, and unless we want to build a whole SIP client into ModemManager, we probably can't do SMS-over-IMS natively. Then again, that might not be so bad. > I can't seem to find anyone at Verizon able to give up useful > information regarding configuration/credentials to make it fly with > the MC7354/ModemManager setup we are developing with. > > Shifting to CDMA operation, the MM messaging API works fine with the > MC7354. With the 2G/3G network (either CDMA 1xRTT, EVDO, or GSM/UMTS) the SMS gets sent via the network layer instead of using IP, so it'll always work just using the modem. > If you think the MC74XX might improve our lot with respect to text > messaging we might make a shift. If all this is correct, then the MC7354 would work, but it'll require a lot more work including an IPv6-capable SIP client library for your apps. Dan > Cheers, > > Jerry. > > > Hey, > > > The new Sierra MC74XX modules are very very different to all > > previous Sierra modules. > > Among other things, they always work in raw-ip mode, and they also > > don't implement > > "DMS UIM" commands. > > > This series of patches introduces some initial support for these > > modules, by trying to modify > > the expected link layer protocol in the kernel to the one reported > > via WDA (if any), and also by > > implementing the "unlock required" check using "UIM Get Card > > Status" instead of "DMS UIM > > Get PIN status". There are multiple other operations based on "DMS > > UIM" that should be > > updated to use "UIM" service operations, but this one at least > > allows using the module when > > the SIM card has PIN request disabled. > > > There's also another patch which ends up requesting Static IP > > configuration on the newly > > connected Bearer if raw-ip is used; for now to avoid needing a DHCP > > client with raw-ip support. > > > Comments welcome! > > > -- > > Aleksander > _______________________________________________ > ModemManager-devel mailing list > ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel _______________________________________________ ModemManager-devel mailing list ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel