On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Dan Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 10:16 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: >> On 20/03/16 20:39, poma wrote: >> > >> > "Newer upower versions no longer emit that signal since this >> > handled by systemd." >> > by Michael Biebl <[email protected]> >> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2014-March/0015 >> > 75.html >> > >> > See also "Plans for UPower 1.0" >> > by Richard Hughes <[email protected]> >> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2013-January/00 >> > 1339.html >> > >> > Signed-off-by: poma <[email protected]> >> Yeah, it may be a good idea to remove this. I explicitly avoided >> talking >> about upower in the NEWS, only because of this. >> >> But NetworkManager still has the same build option; is there anything >> we're missing? or is it that NM should also remove upower support for >> suspend/resume? > > I wasn't really tracking the deprecation stuff for UPower and NM, > though Lubomir might have. The only question I'd have is whether > people use current versions of NM and MM on systems that still run > older versions of UPower, and if so, how long do we support that.
IIIRC, when I first ported the suspend/resume from NM to MM I had to compile myself a very old upower in order to even test it, and that was at least 1 year ago already. I think we should really remove that as poma suggested. Richard's email explaining the 1.0 plans is already 3 years old. -- Aleksander https://aleksander.es _______________________________________________ ModemManager-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel
